Optimal learning in schools theoretical evidence: Part 2 Updating Piaget
Issue 364 | Page 77 | Published Mar 2017
Part 1 in this four-part series of articles discussed Piaget's theories of learning and development (Crossland, 2016). Part 2 explores how post-Piagetian researchers have addressed criticisms of Piaget's theories by linking recent evidence including that from neuroscience. The outcomes show that good teachers make a difference by implementing classroom-based optimal learning strategies. This new evidence brings Piaget's theories into the 21st century and leads to a clearer definition of optimal learning in the classroom.
More from this issue
Set the task for each pupil to collect a single specimen of as many different leaves as possible during 137 seconds.
Students, as well as teachers, often learn what makes sense to them, even when it is wrong. These misconceptions are a problem. The authors sought...
Many students are unclear about what van der Waals and London forces are if they consult several textbooks. To clarify, van der Waals forces...