Description

Open-ended investigations give pupils the opportunity to work creatively to solve a problem. But what ideas need to be taught to enable such creativity? The empirical work reported in this case study shows that an understanding of substantive ideas is not sufficient. A procedural understanding is important. Explicit teaching of the concepts of evidence, and particularly ideas associated with uncertainty in data sets, improves pupils' investigations. The proportion of pupils who then work creatively, responding iteratively throughout the investigation, increases. The curriculum implications are discussed.

Creativity
Open-ended investigations
Evidence

More from this issue

The article endeavours to define creativity and then expands on how creativity can be applied in the classroom and more specifically to science...

Jan 2009
Journal Article

Almost a random walk across insecure stepping stones, this second article on causes of errors deals with misconceptions which seem to persist in...

Jan 2009
Journal Article

This article delves into the thinking process required to build a high-quality curriculum. It argues for having clear design principles upfront,...

Jan 2009
Journal Article