Description

The author has worked in both secondary and primary phases of science education. Her opinion piece looks at the perceived differences between primary and secondary science curricula and proposes that a more unified, cohesive and collaborative approach to expressing and enacting science teaching and learning would overcome many of the reported issues around primary/secondary transition.

Primary-secondary transition

More from this issue

The author challenges us to consider the purpose of a curriculum for science. She proposes an argument for science education where the rationale...

Journal Article

Felicia Mensah, from Columbia University, discusses her work with future teacher educators and how she helped them to engage in conversations...

Journal Article
Journal Article