Description

The author has worked in both secondary and primary phases of science education. Her opinion piece looks at the perceived differences between primary and secondary science curricula and proposes that a more unified, cohesive and collaborative approach to expressing and enacting science teaching and learning would overcome many of the reported issues around primary/secondary transition.

Primary-secondary transition

More from this issue

Pete provides a fascinating reprise of a memorable session presented by Dr. Nasima Hassan, Maaria Ahmad and Romaiza Nassim, relating experiences...

Journal Article

The author challenges us to consider the purpose of a curriculum for science. She proposes an argument for science education where the rationale...

Journal Article