Reviews published in School Science Review are the opinions of individual reviewers, and are not an official Association for Science Education (ASE) view or endorsement of the resource. Reviewers are selected to write reviews on the basis of their experience and interests. They are expected to draw attention to perceived weaknesses or limitations of a resource as well as its strengths. The reviews are written from the standpoint of someone seeing the materials for the first time and considering how they themselves would use them, or think colleagues would be likely to use them
More from this issue
The current Editor looks back at changes in size, style and content as the journal reaches its 100th annual volume.
The Association for Science Education (ASE) invites its members to reflect on the curriculum framework developments outlined in the three articles...
The Royal Society of Chemistry is developing a framework for a relevant and coherent chemistry curriculum for all students.