Do we have a cognitive (psychology) overload? What could the 'Learning Sciences' mean for primary science education? (McMahon)
Issue 90 | Page 34 | Published Nov 2021
Description
This article unpicks the research behind Ofsted's review of research. The author suggests that adopting a wider view of the 'learning sciences', which includes findings from neuroscience, may be necessary for moving forward conversations about science education. She stresses the importance of language, emotions, hands-on learning and enquiry in primary science.
More from this issue
The author has worked in both secondary and primary phases of science education. Her opinion piece looks at the perceived differences between...
David's article focuses on science curricula. He has compared a large number of international science curricula, focusing on language, ideas...